Seen 'em all – 132 FBS teams in action. Two newest to be added. All divisions: 681 games since 1979! Get my new book now available on Amazon.com in Kindle and in Paperback: Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly! Featuring essays: "Vision of the Future" and "For the Love of the Game."
Lebanon, TN – Collegefootballfan.com’s ongoing adventure to attend as many games as possible year after year allows us to display more Top draft picks of 2024 in action than ever before! With the additional years of eligibility due to the 2020 Covid season and eligibility extensions by the NCAA, players in action seen have been around longer than the standard four to five years.
We may not agree with these wide-open transfer policies, but we recognize the opportunity to have seen many top draft picks of 2024 over the course of the last six years or more. Some playing for current schools, and some at previous ones. In addition, our diverse schedules from year-to-year have provided us with opportunities to see players before or after they transferred (too open for our liking). This provides us flexibility to catch players from many different teams over the years. We hope that the NCAA will halt the ability of players to move on to other programs for purely financial purposes. However, we still like seeing the best of college football talent wherever we happen to find it – on purpose or by default.
Quarterbacks
QB Bo Nix performed before us for Auburn against Penn State in 2021 before he rose to become a top draft pick at Oregon. At Auburn for three years, he passed for 7,241 yards, 39 touchdowns and 16 INTs. For OU in two seasons, he threw for 8,101 yards, 74 TDs, and 10 picks.Michigan QB J.J. McCarthy’s stock has moved up as a top draft pick since the Wolverines won the national championship in 2023. Questions derived from Jim Harbaugh’s influence one way, or another, based on his new position as Head Coach of the LA Chargers.As a starter at U of M the last two seasons, McCarthy leaves behind a record of 28-1.Michael Penix Jr. (9) here in action for Indiana in 33-31 win over Western Kentucky in 2021. He moved to the top of the scouting charts with great success the last two years leading Washington to a record of 25-3. There, he averaged a 65.3 % completion rate, threw 67 TDs and 19 interceptions. He finds ways to win though he was slowed by late season injuries for several seasons. In 2021, we watched Devin Leary at his peak in a 45-42 loss to Wake Forest. That season he threw for 3,433 yards, 35 TDs, and five INTs. As a grad student at Kentucky last season, he finished with 2,746 yards, 25 TDs and 12 INTs. He will probably be a late round selection for future development.
Offensive Lineman
Penn State LT Olumuyiwa Fashanu (74) blocked for potent rushing attack in 2023. Seen here against Michigan in 2023. A junior at 6’6″ and 319 lbs., expect him to be considered the prime prospect on the offensive line among top draft picks of 2024.Bama RT JC Latham (65) protected Heisman Winner Bryce Young in the 2022 season. The junior will be called early on to make another quarterback successful in the pros early in his new career.Georgia Bulldog OT Amarius Mims (65) showed his blocking capabilities here against Kentucky in 2023. He’ll be plugging and opening holes against NFL foes in upcoming seasons.Arkansas G Beaux Limmer seals the inside for a Razorback gain against Kansas in 2022 Liberty Bowl. Projected to be a mid-round selection.Duke C Jacob Monk (63), 6’3″ 320 lbs., goes after loose ball in Birmingham Bowl triumph over Troy last December. Look for him to get selected in the middle rounds.Ragin Cajun OT Nathan Thomas (50) opened a hole before halftime festivities for a gain against Texas State in their 2022 41-13 victory in San Marcos. At 6’5″, 334 lbs., pundits project him as a mid-round selection in 2024.
Tight ends
Georgia All-American TE Brock Browers (19) will be called on to run-block and catch passes at the next level. The two-time Mackey Award winner for best college Tight End caught 175 passes for 2,538 and 26 scores in his three seasons at Athens. Definitely the top draft pick at Tight End in 2024. Does he still get to keep his independently negotiated NIL agreement?If so, good for him!TE Theo Johnson (84) hauls in touchdown pass with 1:59 left before Penn State failed on a two-point conversion to put this game out of reach against eventual NCAA champ Michigan in 2023. With 73 grabs for 882 yards and 12 TDs over three seasons, he played a go-to role in short yardage situations. Look for him to go in the middle rounds.
Wide receivers
Georgia WR Ladd McConkey (84) is expected to go in the first round of 2024. Remember Phil McConkey of the NY Giants (and Navy)? No relation as far as we know, but similar skills at the same position.This elusive 6′, 185-lb. WR gained 1,687 yard and scored 14 times with 119 receptions for the Bulldogs during three seasons.Texas WR Adonai Mitchell looks to go by fourth round. Seen here against Baylor in 2022, he caught 93 passes over three seasons. With a string running attack, he still averaged 15.1 yards per reception and scored 18 touchdowns.Michigan WR Roman Wilson (1) stopped here for a short gain by Penn State in 2023 victory. He stepped up in U of M’s championship season with 48 receptions for 789 yards and 12 TDs. This elusive playmaker will probably get selected in the middle rounds of the 2024 draft.
Running backs
RB Trey Benson showed pass-catching skills out of the backfield for Florida State here against Wake Forest in 2023. In two seasons, he carried the rock 310 times for 1,895 yards, 6.1 yards per run, and totaled 23 TDs. He never fumbled. This versatile ball carrier alos made 33 catches out of the backfield for 371 yards and TD. Good size at 6’1′, 223 lbs. Definitely top draft pick material.Re’Mahn (aka Ray) Davis (20), who moved on later to Vanderbilt and to Kentucky, scored for Temple early in 2019 Military Bowl loss to UNC, 55-19. Will he commit to play long-term for any team who selects him? In five seasons at three schools, he ran for 4,026 yards and 29 TDs. On catches out of the backfield, he posted 762 yards and 12 scores. His teams posted a combined record of 23-34.The Duke defense held Troy RB Kamani Vidal (28) to seventy yards and no TDs in the 2023 Birmingham Bowl. Previously, he exploded for five rushing touchdowns among 233 yards on 26 carries before us when Troy to defeated Appalachian State for the Sun Belt title, 49-23. Attribute the fall-off to a coaching change-over. He averaged over five yards per carry over four years where he displayed improvement in yards per each season from 516 to 701 to 1,132 to 1,661 in 2023. He will make great catch for a team in the later rounds.
Defensive linemen
Texas DL Byron Murphy (90) in pursuit of Baylor Bear in 2022. He recorded eight sacks among 68 stops in three seasons. We look for him to go in the later rounds.Auburn decked Vanderbilt in Nashville in 2023 as DT Marcus Harris (50) applied pressure with others on this play. Probably a late round pick in the upcoming draft.
Linebackers
Alabama EDGE Dallas Turner (15) showed us open field tackling capabilities here against Utah State in 2022. At 6’4″, 242 lbs, he could be converted to a linebacker in the NFL.He tallied 22.5 sacks for Bama.Should be top draft pick in Round 1. We caught LB Tryce Knight (10 in white) of UTEP in 2023 against Jacksonville State in our opener. He averaged 113 tackles annually and picked two passes for the Miners his past three seasons.
Defensive backs
2022 Music City Bowl MVP and DB Cooper DeJean (3) makes one of his eight stops against Kentucky. He also returned a pick six for the Hawkeyes’ third and final score of the second period and of the game, a 21-0 Iowa victory. Top draft pick out of the secondary in 2024. Seven career picks, three for TDs, and 120 tackles for the Hawkeyes.Top Toledo CB Qunyon Mitchell applies a solid stop here against Bowling Green in the Rockets’ 2023 win. Six career INTs, two for scores. 124 tackles. Projected to go in early rounds.Tight coverage like this by Kool-Aid McKinstry of Alabama will be called on to shut down prime receivers in the NFL. Could be a top draft pick in the first round. Two career picks and 93 tackles for The Tide.Penn State CBs Kalen King (4) and Marquis Wilson halt Purdue ball carrier in third period in 2022. Deep secondary talent in this year’s draft. King tallied three picks for the Lions and 80 stops over three seasons.Wake Forest CB Caelen Carson holds Florida State WR to a short gain here in 2023. He’ll be the next in line among Demon Deacs defenders to add some pop to an NFL secondary. Carson hauled in three enemy passes and posted 119 tackles.Texas State University S Kaleb Culp (2) returns a 31-yard fumble recovery to open the Bobcat scoring in their 52-44 win over South Alabama in 2023. With 81 tackles in each of the last two seasons, an INT and this fumble return, Kulp may get selected in the late rounds of 2024.Seen here against Auburn in 2021, Penn State CB Daequan Hardy (25) picked five passes and recorded 5.5 sacks for the Lions in his career. Predict he will go in Round 5 or 6.
Other top draft picks seen, but not recorded
Despite taking too many pictures, between missed opportunities, blurred pictures, and an inferior camera used early on, we missed some shots of some of the best. Among them, WR Marvin Harrison of Ohio State at Penn State in 2022. He caught 10 passes for 183 yards in that one. Zoom lense broke! CB Terrion Arnold of Alabama against Utah State in 2022. I don’t remember Bama on defense too often – a lot of three-and-outs. Disappointed I couldn’t capture any shots of Illinois DL Zer’zhan (Johnny) Newton in 2023 game against Penn State. Had to use my cell phone and missed shots of a definite top draft pick. Defective camera snapped all defective pictures to void shots of Missouri CB Ennis Rakestraw, DL Darius Robinson and RB Cody Shrader in their win over Vanderbilt. Next season, I hope to be better prepared with a better camera and better strategy for top draft picks.
ed. by Steve Koreivo. member of Football Writer’s Association of America
Lebanon, TN – Believe it – revenue sharing qualifies as one of eight improvements offered in Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly. In James Parks’s online article of March 12 on CFB-HQ Fan Nation, Nick Saban reiterates exactly what I proposed. That calls for an NCAA augmented revenue sharing system. Read “Nick Saban offers solution to NIL in college football to Congress.” After that, purchase your copy of Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales. Read about this and seven other proposals made to improve the game of college football. Many fans will lose interest in the game based on the direction the sport spiraling away from competitiveness. I present solutions to other issues negatively impacting college football in my second of two essays at the end of my life-long adventure entitled, “For the Love of the Game.”
Revenue-sharing: the first step
Nick Saban presented his revenue-sharing idea to Congress. In my book, under the subtitle “Revenue Sharing” in my final essay, emphasis highlighted, regretfully, the need for federal legislation. It points out that the Name Image and Likeness (NIL) policy abused by Collectives makes only rich programs richer. The policy creates a greater imbalance of competition within college football.
Nick Saban can address some issues effectively for college football such as revenue-sharing. On the other hand, there are issues that he won’t address because he used them during his career to achieve success.
More steps to be taken, or else.
In the end with the combined changes taking place, college fan interest will start to dwindle. Saban presented all the NIL issues adeptly to Congress. What Fifty Years also addressed includes other issues that also make college football less competitive. Other challenges remain ahead, and most likely, Nick Saban will not challenge them. Strength of schedule evaluation, scheduling manipulation, playoff formats, budget considerations, graduate school questions, and post-season participation prevent leveling the play on the football field. In addition, topics such as TV time-outs that minimize fan interest should be addressed. Without further review and solutions applied soon, the spirit of this great game may terminate the interest it stirs will be gone. Pay for play replaces what we savored as “the old college try.”
We unload a broadside of revenue-sharing to offset the unfair power of NILs.
Steve Koreivo, ed. Member of Football Writers Association of America
My book Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly showed some encouraging progress this week. It landed at No. 60 among Amazon.com’s Kindle list in the category of “Guided Journals.” Still a long way to go in various football categories. We hope Tales will conjure up more interest among fans looking to understand the latest changes impacting this great sport. We address these issues as well as provide solutions to help improve this great game rather than destroy it. Released in September, the major media has only started to address and weigh in on some ideas that Tales already addresses. Like the last Salvo we fired off here last week, this book looks beyond the upcoming season as to how some of these changes will fare in the future.
Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly.
Spread the word
Tell your friends to check out the Author page on Amazon.com, buy the book and submit a review. If Kindle is not their reading preference, it’s also available in paperback. It fulfills tastes not only primarily for sports fans. The adventure falls into genres of Humor and Travels as well. It’s also a story about work-life balance. The endeavor reaches into the author’s family, faith and career endeavors as well. The book tells the tale of enjoying a lifetime passion without sacrificing focus on life’s essentials.
-posted by Steve Koreivo, ed. Member of Football Writer’s Association of America
Steveo’s Salvos: A broadside on Donors’ Return on Investments
Lebanon, TN – Once the NCAA announced in June 2021 that college athletic programs could raise funds through contracted collectives regarding their newly implemented Name, Image and Likeness aka NIL policy, many donors, alumni and business organizations jumped on the bandwagon. Many sent forth vast sums of money to invest millions of dollars to allow their respective schools through newly formed Collectives to make offers to talented players to come to their schools once they signed a letter of intent to attend alma mater dear. Well, that was the understanding originally. However, much has changed since this started only a few years ago.
Since Collectives don’t have to abide by the NCAA Do’s and Don’ts that schools and athletes need to adhere to, the NIL policy now entices athletes to leave their current program to transfer to another. Already, plenty of head coaches among many Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) competitors accuse others of doing this. However, they rarely name names in order to keep the peace. For they eventually fall into the same trap to enable their team to compete on the gridiron as well. The demands needed to compete on the field cause the NIL policy to grow as a collateral competition in college football. Survival of the fittest, or basically, the richest, depends on it.
Great NIL Policy Expectations?
Enthusiastic donors, alumni and business organizations aren’t holding back in the early going of the new NIL policy. They sink millions of dollars into these newfound war-chests. The media celebrates the hype of what players are moving on to new programs. One has to wonder though, what is the expected Rate on Investment (ROI) anticipated for these significant donations? For what donors invest into alma mater dear’s NIL policy, they must expect something in return. It’s supposedly disposable income for most, but with the amounts being invested now, there’s got to be some grand expectations.
Of course, the initial feeling is the return of satisfaction or happiness in giving this money to one’s school to help them compete. The short-term goal helps recruit the best team possible to play to win on the football field. In the end, however, is that going to be enough? For now, figure among 134 different FBS football programs, every season, only one is going to be crowned “National Champion.”
Donors or Owners?
These donors, in reality, are becoming investors in their favorite school’s football program. Of course, few can’t afford to buy a professional franchise. Maybe they see this investment compensating between their desire to own a real NFL team and owning a “Fantasy football team.” The stakes are generally much higher than the latter, of course. These are big money donations providing money for real teams with real people. These real people, all on one real team and under one hired coaching staff, drop passes, miss tackles, jump offsides on critical downs, make questionable decisions on the sideline, sit out when injured, or just play poorly on a given game day. Things don’t always go the right way. Some players stay along the sideline.
Satisfaction variables
No satisfaction guaranteed. Are these investors all going to be satisfied over time if their school program has at least a winning season of 7-5 every year? Or is 6-6 to get into a “consolation game” (I refuse to call these “bowl games”) good enough to keep big spenders happy to re-invest the following season? Will they be totally satisfied as long their school knocks off their cross-state rival more often than not? Will they only be satisfied if their team wins their conference every year? Can satisfaction be derived by becoming one of 12 teams to gain a bid to the new college football playoff (CFP) format? Every season? Once in a while? A few teams may dominate and achieve some, but not all, of these goals.
Live and learn.
At what point does an NIL policy investor say, “That’s it! It’s not worth my money.” The definition of happiness among all investors will vary. Some will be more demanding than others. How great will the pressure be on coaches that don’t meet the investors’ expectations? How many investors insist on firing their head coach? Fans already witness this among top, winning programs today. How many good coaches will figure, “I’ve had enough. I’m going to the pros where I have one major investor to deal with-the owner.” In addition to coaching a team, they are also primary fundraisers to keep donations rolling in. That’s a full-time job in itself. They already manage 85 players, assistant coaches and recruiting responsibilities to find new players to replace ones moving on. And with the current NIL policy and the transfer portal options, that could be half of a roster.
And what will happen when the players these investors provided money for decide to leave because they don’t start? Or perhaps, because the coach is moving on? What kind of pressure are investors going to use then? “If this player leaves, don’t expect any more money from me!” Like everything else changing so fast in college football, this is when scholarships will morph into contracts. Donors invest their money for collectives to “hire” players. “The coach may leave, but that player better not be following him. I made my investment to bring that player into our program, not the coach’s.” Sorry NCAA.
The NIL Policy in a State of Flux
Oh yes! Players, donors, coaches to some extent, schools, alumni associations and booster clubs are enjoying the NIL policy now. However, when those investments kick in to satisfy a multitude of investors looking for their team to finish at the top at the end of the season, there will only be one team there. One hundred thirty-three others will have toppled along the way. Some investors may remain satisfied with their investment. “At least we beat our cross-state rival!” But how much did they donate? A few will still see a glimmer of hope for the following season, but there are going to be many more programs who are going to see the loss of benefactors fall out of line without a satisfactory return on their investment.
$urvival
Only the “rich will survive.” That will be because they will be the only ones to sustain more funds through the current NIL policy. Winners get more donations. When we witness a dynasty, it will be built on a mountain of money. When that happens, there are going to be more disheartened than enthusiastic football fans in the collegiate ranks.
Money from the NIL policy won’t be expanding among the majority of collectives to build more competition in college football. Investors will find more satisfying options to use their disposable income. NIL donations will be contracting among most to leave a small group of elite teams left to play football among themselves. As I suggest in my book Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good the Fun and the Ugly, it makes sense now to break up the FBS. It’s got to happen now. Even Nick Saban concurs that what we have now is not college football.
Nick Saban sees the light. From his new view in retirement, he sees the impact of the NIL policy which calls for some changes to preserve “college” football.
Steveo’s Salvos: Firing a broadside at NCAA “Boneheads”
Lebanon, TN- The more reports coming out of meetings the NCAA boneheads, as described accurately by Charles Barkley, NBA and college basketball broadcaster and Hall of Famer, the more the great traditions of college football seem on their way out for good. Read Jame Parks’ online report of February 19, “Charles Barkley calls out NIL in college football: ‘We screwed up’.” I, like many fans, enjoyed the opportunities of surprise and upsets over the years. There definitely were not enough. However, the alignments that continue to take place by putting more money into the elite programs just decimate the competition among 134 teams at the Football Bowl Subdivisions (FBS) even further.
NCAA Boneheads: Maybe there is a Strategy after all
Already, the desire of expanded playoffs many fans looked forward to is becoming another tool for the “rich” to get richer.” Look no further than the “Power Five” of college football. As written in Ross Dellenger’s article on Yahoosports.com, “Change is coming to CFP. What will it look like?” on February 21, already the SEC and Big Ten are positioning themselves to monopolize eight of twelve automatic seeds in the College Football Playoffs (CFP) starting in 2026. Where’s the Federal Trade Commission with the anti-trust suits? Lack of competition will probably knock about 75% of FBS college football programs right out of the ranks of the “competitive.”
The NCAA boneheads just don’t “react” as Charles Barkley assesses. More importantly, they don’t, can’t and won’t plan effectively to make this sport more competitive for all 134 teams involved. And these people pride themselves on representing so-called “institutions of higher learning?” Is this what and how they teach college students today? Let’s come up with some ideas, see how they work, and try to fix them later if they don’t. “Oops!” In reality, the boneheads are feeding only to an elite group of NCAA members who see beneficial opportunities unfolding before them.
How about fair-shares?
As recorded in my book, Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales, the Good, the Fun and the Ugly, I have no contentions with players sharing in the vast revenues of the sport being made. On the other “Oops” hand, however, I can’t see giving 18-year-olds enough money to buy a house before they’ve played a down or attended a class. Or buying a Lamborghini before even earning a college degree and getting a good job and starting a career in football or any other profession. Something for nothing? Handouts? And if this money is only for name, image and likeness (NIL), don’t all 10,000 FBS players deserve the same amount of money? Their images can all be seen on the TV screen during a game.
If football focuses not on “pay for play,” why do some players get offered significant sums higher than their teammates or the guys across the line of scrimmage? Fans wouldn’t watch if one can’t win and the other can’t lose. Don’t both sides have names, images and likenesses? Why are some compensated more than the others? They can’t claim it’s for being better football players. Schools don’t pay students for that in college. That’s supposedly not what they’re being paid for.
And NILs possibly exist beyond the playing field
The original intent of this sport for the players good enough to earn came with the chance to reap the benefit of a free college scholarship. All of a sudden, these scholarships aren’t worth anything? Ask the millions of families whose kids don’t play a major college sport. Many have to go into debt for tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars if they aren’t. If their kids could all only be about 6’ 5” tall and weigh close to 300 lbs. or run a 4.0 in a 40-yard dash. Why does that matter? If they can’t, they’ve all got names, likenesses and images. Multitudes of fans see them on the dance cams, kiss cams, smile cams, on-field award ceremonies and in the stands during breaks in the action or cheering their team on.
Wait for some disgruntled parents of college-age kids coming forth with some class action. Why can’t their kids don’t get paid the same NIL money. Supposedly that’s the reason these other students playing football earn money. We’re told it’s not for their athletic prowess. If this is the case, who believes this? However, football coaches at lower levels among the Group of Five teams beg to differ, to say the least. Their best football players transfer to play for richer programs (Power Five or P5s). They offer more money for their name, image and likeness – not for playing football which they just happen to do.
NCAA Boneheads’ biggest blunder?
It’s over. The Power Five’s look out for themselves. For more money, they close ranks among themselves as to who will be in this circle. As I indicate in Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales, in the end there will be 40-48 schools leveraging ESPN or other networks for all the football money. Will they have the audacity to schedule the have-nots left behind to throw them a bone once in a while? Probably, but only to keep them alive to develop and eventually take their best players. They have through the more dangerous creation of the NCAA boneheads. That is the unlimited opportunity to leave after being recruited by the collectives of the 40-48 programs through a wide-open transfer portal. The current P5s entice to attract talent among what’s referred to among the lower as the Group of Five (G5s) conferences.
Smoke and Mirrors.
To keep some hopes up for the lesser schools, they allow them one slot among the 12 for the College Football Playoff (CFP). And if 85 scholarship players aren’t enough for P5 programs, the system exists already rigged to add more players without scholarships. One of the directors of a collective points this out in Ross Dellenger’s Yahoosports.com piece of February 19, “As college football’s elite is engulfed in a power struggle, G5 left just trying to survive: ‘We are a farm system,’ “P5s can fill 30 available openings that the NCAA boneheads currently allow for “walk-ons.” They now raise money just for this.
Every now and then you will see a player at some program awarded a full ride. They serve the program as a non-scholarship walk-on and eventually earn that money. However, in the article, the collectives raise more money now to induce talented walk-ons with money through the transfer portal to their new team. Good for the walk-ons, but supposedly inducements are illegal.
P5 Power play
Though Barkley refers to the NCAA boneheads as being totally reactive, I pointed out in my article on February 2, “Who is the NCAA? Answer: 134 members with Football Programs who approved NIL policy.” These NCAA boneheads come from among the 134 football playing member schools and more. And from among these programs, because of television money, SEC and Big Ten members are strong voices that influence such decisions.
I have a hard time believing that these two conferences aren’t manipulating the NCAA boneheads as ignorantly as considered. They seem to be positioning themselves right where they want to be. If they don’t get things their way, they have the power, the money, and the media right where they need them. They can take all the money and run. They will have their Super Conference(s) and everything else they need to reorganize themselves without the NCAA. Other schools will fend for themselves.
G5 Power play
The best leverage the remnants will have among themselves is Basketball. The 40-48 alone may not be as attractive media-wise as the 351 teams competing for the NCAA tournament at that level. And in recent seasons, more of the lesser football and non-football playing members have made inroads deep into the Final Four. Last year, UConn, San Diego State, and Florida Atlantic made up three of the Four. In recent years, Gonzaga, St Peter’s, Florida Gulf Coast and Loyola-Chicago have made deep runs. Most of football’s Power Fives haven’t approached that yet. A game with primarily ten players on the court at one time becomes more competitive with equivalent talent than with a game needing 22 players on the field at one time. Hopefully, they will let that basketball tradition to remain intact.
What NCAA boneheads lack: Foresight
I fear the outcome of what the NCAA boneheads have allowed to destroy the competitiveness of college football. If the future of college football results as I reported in the first of my two essays at the end of my book, “Vision of the Future,” I will probably care less about The Super Conference or whatever it will become or its championship outcome. Like many, I’ve already lost most of my interest in pro football. For me, that was mostly because of my attachment to the college game. Other fans indicate other reasons. Domination by few of many doesn’t bode well for fans who favor fair competition.
If the 40-48 move on to the professional route as I envision in this chapter, my focus will fall on what, if any competitive college football remains. Meaning I will follow the possibility of FCS, D2 and D3 remaining. Although they too will become minor leagues now to the highest levels. I like my football competitive no matter what the level. I just see the FBS becoming a bore, repetitive, predictable and another NFL. Best players no doubt, but they won’t be student-athletes attending classes. The game will only be driven financially in every aspect.
Plans? Solutions?
My second and final essay in the book is entitled, “For the Love of the Game.” In it, I offer plans and solutions to make the game more competitive. Making it better for more players and fans of their favorite teams comprise my objective. I offer some controls that the NCAA boneheads could have and should have considered. At least they should have analyzed before they decided and implemented these changes. Instead, they took a weak approach – let’s do this and see what happens.
Of course, as I mentioned, a core group of this membership probably whole-heartedly agreed with the changes. They sat back and saw the financial benefits they were hoping for all along. After that, they picked up the phone and called their state legislature, probably an alumnus. They informed them what the despicable NCAA was going to do to thwart the improvement of their beloved football program. Their plans seem to be working perfectly for what they want.
Steve Koreivo, ed. Member of Football Writer’s Association of America
In a colorful tribute by the Iowa State Cyclone Marching Band to their fellow Big XII members, next season two will be gone, and four more will be added. Good signs or bad signs for the future of college football and the Big XII brought on by the NCAA Boneheads?
Lebanon, TN – Several articles came out this past week glorifying the development of NIL deals. Outside of a few “student-athletes” making the big bucks on for their names, images and likenesses, only certain schools will profit even more. That seems to be the intent. As more money pours in from many sources, especially for new monies earmarked for NIL deals, schools benefit. They will avoid ever having to actually pay their intended future college football playing employees.
NIL deals will transcend scholarships
Those who believe these highly-paid, “pretty” people should be paying their own way through college, will get their wish. Schools will no longer offer football scholarships. Players will become employees eventually, instead of “student- athletes.” It sounds like the plan is already underway. Everything colleges want to do is going as planned as predicted in my book, Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly. A great thing occurring for the anticipated 40-48 schools who will break away from the NCAA to form a new college football association, their employees will now pay them for the education while working for them. Contract money will be paid by collectives. The question arises though, will player contracts then be initiated to slow down the transfer portal?
In Sam Neumann’s story online in Awful Announcing on February 15, 2024, “College athletes to receive NIL money for documentary appearance,” a new documentary called Money Game. It will be released soon depicting the LSU athletic program and the NIL deals that benefit their athletic program. The Prime Video release refers to this documentary as “a historic turning point in the NCAA upon policy changes on name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights—guaranteed to shape the trajectory of college sports forever.” It highlights four NIL deals. They include three for elite LSU woman athletes and for outgoing Heisman Trophy winner, quarterback Jayden Daniels. Daniels ranked fourth among college football players with value from NIL deals.
A degree of discomfort with NIL deals
Produced by Campfire Studios, Axios Entertainment, and Jersey Legends, a production company founded by Shaquille O’Neal, well-known LSU basketball alumnus, the article goes on to say that the athletes featured in Money Game “will receive payment under the guise of ‘NIL compensation.’” Employees featured on it, such as coaches of each of the players, will not. The word “guise” here almost makes it seem like there is a concern that these appearances could construe potential NIL violations. Arrangements here can be totally legal. However, perceptions may challenge some views. NIL deals are not only new, but possibly still unclear to the general public. Rules vary by state making NIL deals inconsistent from school to school. How fair is this?
More money, more money
On the same day of Neumann’s story above, InsideHook released this article by Michael Stahl, “University of Michigan Unveils Major NIL Expansion.” On February 14, U of M’s athletics department invested in a strategic formula for “the growth of its in-house NIL (Name, Image and Likeness) program.” They created two new positions dedicated to strengthening the school’s marketability. They offer NIL deals with the respective assistance of Altius Sports Partners, an advisory firm focused on NIL deals, and Learfield, a sports marketing company.
The new positions of executive general manager and senior manager of business development will “empower its student-athletes” and provide “forward-thinking initiative.” The report goes on to say this strategic move will offer “specialized expertise, enabling them (student athletes) to navigate and maximize NIL opportunities skillfully.” Stahl concludes that this means,” they’ll have a better chance to make more money at Michigan.”
What is the Law?
What statement other than that last one cannot be clearer that college football is on its way to becoming a professional football league? “Pay for play” is supposedly not what college football is about, but the momentum is certainly taking it in that direction. What this article does not explain is what current Michigan laws are in place regarding NIL deals. Again, these laws vary from state to state. There still exists many uneven playing fields when it comes to college football recruiting.
ESPN Staff Writer Dan Murphy wrote an article online on January 10 entitled, “NCAA approves new NIL rules to help athletes ‘protect themselves.‘” Very interesting and well transcribed scenario. The NCAA makes a proposition to continue the implementation of NIL deals for the good of the players to share the wealth. It also proposes to make changes to level the playing field as prescribed here for all college football programs. Two days after this proposal was made, Marc Edelman, Senior Legal contributor for FORBESBUSINESSSPORTSMONEY, published an article online, “New Challenge To NCAA NIL Rules Is ‘Engineered’ On Firm Legal Ground.” Edelman specializes in legal issues regarding sports, fantasy sports and online gaming.
Anti-trust precedence
In it, he highlights a precedence presented by the National Society of Professional Engineers that had “attempted to defend their competitive bidding restraints by arguing that an important social policy goal—promoting customer focus on the safety of engineering—needed to supersede free market forces.” They tried to use this argument to have their customers select engineering sources based on safety before finalizing a price. This move undermines price competition, exactly what the Sheman anti-trust laws prevent. Being a Purchasing Professional for 42 years, I never would have agreed to this. We would always consider the entire value of the package including price quotes along with other pre-determined parameters like quality, service, and payment terms. An engineering firm could present safety parameters along with a pricing proposal simultaneously.
Interestingly to me, he confirms what I surmised in my book. He states in his treatise, “Finally, Part VI concludes that even if a court were to find that competitive balance is a reasonable basis for upholding certain “no pay” rules, such rules still should not come from the NCAA, but rather from the individual conference level.” This justifies my premise that 40-48 “power” football programs, based on the higher revenues that they make and seek, will terminate their memberships with the NCAA.
The remaining Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) teams basically in the Group of Five conferences will be on their own. The new Super Conference of 40-48 will establish their media contracts, their recruiting rules, post-season competition and their future independently of the NCAA membership, if the organization still oversees any football. The remaining teams may stay as full members of the NCAA. They can then abide by whatever rules they come up within each conference if they agree to equalize the level of playing competitively.
READ ALL ABOUT IT!
The next challenge legally, however, will be how and if the players from within both organizations will be allowed to move from one to the other through current transfer portals. That will most likely still become another anti-trust issue. To read more about how and why this is happening, purchase my book, Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly. The last two essays presented lay out what to expect, but definitely sooner than I expected.
Steve Koreivo, ed. Member of Football Writes Association of America
Alabama RB Jahmyr Gibbs (1) on the run versus Utah State. When the Power Five leaves the NCAA with more lucrative NIL deals, these two should not meet again. The two separate divisions should play under different rules for separate championships.
Lebanon, TN- The hits on college football just keep on coming. Will the game played for, by and with student-athletes survive? I mean in popularity among fans? In the direction the game is heading in, it looks like it will eventually battle the NFL for all the big bucks it currently makes. I analyzed this possible move in my book, Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly. I envisioned a plan where ten things need to happen for the top 40-48 Football Bowl Subdivision programs to form a professional football league. However, I didn’t anticipate how quickly this could happen.
With what’s happened within this past month since Michigan defeated Washington on January 8, unless the seemingly powerless NCAA can institute some strong controls, move over NFL. As things roll along as they are, maybe the major college football members of the NCAA did have a plan all along.
College football priorities changing with a purpose
For sure, no incentive exists to maintain an organization dedicated to educating student-athletes anymore. The priority now seems to be to let student-athletes transfer at lightning speed just for the sake of playing the sport at another school. Non-student athletes can also transfer, but at the speed and with the ease of college football players? Realize there used to be transcripts, applications to fill, financial reviews and possible interviews for transfers’ acceptances. A decision process used to take some time. However, once players decide to transfer or even before, it only takes a day or two before these guys know where they’re going.
In Bill Bender’s article in The Sporting News on January 30, 2024’ “Ohio State’s Caleb Downs, Will Howard, Quinshon Judkins talk ‘recruiting on steroids’, title shot,” Downs stated he received 102 phone calls within eight hours from other schools to transfer. A day or so later, the entire world knew he was leaving Alabama to enroll at Ohio State. That was quick! He knew he already had a scholarship at the next stop before he even got his final grades.
Do grades even matter anymore?
Believe me, I know in many cases this hasn’t been the priority for student athletes in the past, but with thousands of college football players now entering the portals? I find it hard to believe that during the holiday break season that many of the people in the admission offices are in the office to review the required documentation. It’s as if the members of the NCAA, so-called “institutions of higher learning,” are blatantly accepting that grades no longer matter now. Not all courses can be transferred from one school to another, and only passing grades are accepted. Not that Downs’ grades are public information, but doesn’t this have to be known by the accepting school? I’m sure these students have become priorities now based on the financial gains ahead for the top FBS college football programs.
New priorities at the collegiate level
That’s because the move is taking place to eradicate the student athletes and make them employees to drive up school revenues where they see easy money from their perspective once again. We’re seeing them testing this new opportunity in several ways. A sixth year of football eligibility was bestowed on every player due to Covid in 2020. Schools found they could afford that. Now, little by little, some players have attained seven, eight and now even nine years of playing eligibility – even after attaining degrees. The education is complete. So how can they and why do schools keep players even longer to play “college football?”
I’ll show you the money.
Colleges have always been great marketers. They already convince families to go into high debt to finance their sons’ and daughters’ educations for degrees where they will take years to pay off. Even if the government defers the loans, the colleges will still get the money from the government. Now, schools take the Name, Image and Likenesses of college football players and sell them out on the open markets through entities called “collectives.” These collectives are not part of the university. Basically, they are third party contractors. Rules and regulations avoiding “pay for play,” not allowed within the NCAA. They only have to be abided by the institutions of higher learning and the “student-athletes” they recruit.
However, nothing in the NIL regulations say anything about these contracted collectives. This arrangement mitigates any contact between schools and college football recruits to play for the school. In the meantime, schools with major college football programs simultaneously lobby members of state governments to draft laws to protect them from any NCAA violations brought against them should they occur. The governor of Tennessee is fending off the NCAA tenaciously regarding violations brought regarding the recruitment of QB Nicholaus Iamaleava.
Collectively speaking
Now, the collectives contact alumni, boosters, local and national businesses to donate money to fund coffers to make offers to high schoolers for sell their Name, Image and Likenesses (NIL) – supposedly. Before the 2023 season began, reports by coaches of college football programs stated collectives were also approaching their existing college football players to entice them to transfer. Players can now enter these transfer portals that open twice a year – once after the regular season ends, and once after the end of the spring football practice which generally coincides with the end of the spring semester. The air waves are full of conversations between collective representatives and players looking for better opportunities including NIL money. Surely, even parents encourage their sons to seek such opportunities for the good of every family.
In essence, the schools don’t even have to offer these players a free education. They can pay for it themselves with the NIL money available to them. However, schools may just offer these students tuition for free as part of a benefit package. They will probably need to do this because they have to offer some compensation directly to hire players as employees of the university. Funny thing is that the major money will still be coming through these collectives. Schools won’t have to pay the athletes directly, their contactors will.
Another litmus test being conducted by college football
I refer to this as a litmus test because I find this hard to uphold. The Ivy league doesn’t award athletic scholarships. I always understood student-athletes among the Ancient Eight applied for financial assistance like every other student applicant. So, what compensation do Dartmouth basketball players get that other non-athletic students don’t get? In this case, if basketball players unionize, do students working part-time on campus in labs, the library, as part of some research project, (I doubt Ivy League students would work in the cafeteria, but…) or some other paid position, can they also join a union? Now all college students working a job while receiving an education can join a “student union?” The Northwestern football team’s effort fell apart in 2015. At least they were “compensated” by athletic scholarships. A big question is if schools will still dole out athletic scholarships once players are contracted by money paid by collectives. All I can say is, what a mess.
Got money? Invest in the future professional football league while you can.
Great news for Missouri Tiger football.”College Football Program Hits Jackpot With Massive Donation From Anonymous Giver” reported Joe Vitale online through Athlon Sports on February 5. An anonymous donor gifted the Missouri Tiger football program $62 million. The donation directs $50 million for improvements to Memorial Stadium and the balance of $12 million will go toward the school’s collective, the Tiger Fund. The article refers to it as a “charitable program through the Tiger Scholarship Fund that benefits Mizzou student-athletes.” To think, this is Missouri, an SEC member who currently plays Georgia in the SEC East and looks to challenge to beat them and Alabama for the overall SEC title.
This is just the start. With 32 NFL teams already owned by individuals with lots of money, if anybody wants to get in on the ground floor of a new professional football league get in on it now! With contracts for Saturday football viewing on TV and stadiums already packed by captive students, alumni and devout fans of their universities, eventually there could be a return on your investment.
The potential future of professional football
Now realizing they have everything in place to grow a professional league from the bottom-up, all colleges need to do is hold on to the players for five or more years starting right out of high school. They’ll hold on to the best talent they can with NILs being funded by thousands of alumni through collectives in most cases. How can the NFL compete for new talent then? Draft players right out of high school? The product they will present on the playing will be far from what they’ve got now. And to develop players at a minor league level would be near impossible. Colleges already have the infrastructure, fan base, media exposure, traditions and outpouring of money from alumni and corporations through collectives to” hire” and keep the best of the best football talent for as long as they want.
Go to college, play football, buy a Lamborghini
Here’s another tidbit: why go into the NFL draft while you can make so much playing college football. And if you can learn how to invest wisely while in college, maybe you can just retire and enjoy the “good life.” Read Criss Floyd’s article here from February 6, 2024: Georgia QB Carson Beck purchases Lamborghini as NIL value reportedly tops $1 million.” Throw for 3,941 yards, 24 touchdowns and lead your team to a 13-1 record and an Orange Bowl victory over a portal-decimated Florida State program, 66-3, and your $1.1 million year can escalate to $3 million the following year. If the “other” pro league approaches beyond that in a draft, use it to leverage your future. Especially if you can get a waiver to play a few more years, or even sign a long-term contract as an employee of the institution of higher learning who will continue pay you to play a game.
The NFL has to be looking at this because college football is their player development league. Unlike Major League Baseball or the National Hockey League, the NFL didn’t have to invest anything in minor league franchises. Tax dollars, student revenues and alumni financial support took care of all that player development at the collegiate level. Players get a big hug from the commissioner on draft day, but that’s about it. The football world is about to change. Read how this is all falling into place in my book, Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly now available on Amazon.com.
Stephen Koreivo -ed. Member of Football Writers Association of America
To keep up with the Joneses of college football, Missouri will invest $50 million to upgrade their Memorial Stadium to catch up with Alabama’s Bryant-Denny Stadium.
Lebanon, TN – As traditionally reported prior annually before every Super Bowl contest, we celebrate the collegiate careers of participants in games we refer to as “Super Memories.” We hold on to a vast number of photos from games attended. They depict live game action, catching glimpses of key plays or just accumulating file photos to assure we capture some of the hidden gems we see play in college.
Photographing line play and action at some smaller schools help us capture players we never knew would make it to this level. The practice is “hit or miss,” but fun when we find that we witnessed a player before he became a “household name.” Enjoy the action of players we saw who made it to the biggest stage in all of football when they provided us with super memories during their college football careers.
Super Memories of Kansas City Chiefs
Saw KC RB Isaiah Pacheco (1) in action several times for Rutgers. Here, we saw him in 2019 against Boston College.In 2015, we recorded a very super memory. Georgia Tech’s Harrison Butker converted a 35-yard FG here with 54 seconds left to tie No. 9 Florida State, 16-16. Tech defeated FSU on a blocked FG to win this game as time expired. Stanford Soph Safety Justin Reid (8) takes an angle to make a stop. The Cardinal defeated the Cal in their 2016 edition of The Big Game.In his sixth season in the pros, WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling (11) provided blocking for RB Marion Mack. Here, South Florida faced Temple at Lincoln Financial Field in 2016. The No. 19 USF Bulls fell to the Owls this evening, 46-30.As a redshirt freshman, Oklahoma C Creed Humphrey (56) can be seen here blocking for Kyler Murray. Here, his Sooners fell in the 2018 CFP semi-finals against Alabama. On Sunday, he will be blocking for Patrick Mahomes once again in the Super Bowl.Army LB Cole Christiansen (54) and fellow Cadets put a stop here against Navy in 2018. Army prevailed, 17-10. He’s now on the Chiefs’ active roster for his second Super Bowl as of January 17. Begs the question from him, what’s bigger – beating Navy or winning Super Bowl?
Super Memories of San Francisco 49ers
Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey (5) added this 90-yard touchdown explosion here against Cal in 2016. He made up for his earlier absence during this particular season when he missed the Notre Dame game we attended due to injury. His team also won that one in South Bend.South Carolina Gamecock WR Deebo Samuel (1), here against Vandy in 2018, is heralded now as a primary offensive weapon in the NFL.Gamecock DT Javon Kinlaw (3) also saw action versus Vandy that day. He will be right in the middle of things on Super Bowl Sunday.CB Charvarius Ward (2) steps in as one of four former Middle Tennessee players in this year’s Super Bowl. He’s the only one on the 49ers. Two years ago, he won it playing for KC. Here we saw him in action against the Minnesota Golden Gophers in 2017.Clemson WR Ray-Ray McCloud after a catch in the 2017 upset loss to Syracuse. Super Memory for us, not him. He went pro after his junior season with 49 catches, 505 yards, and one TD. He’s catching passes from Brock Purdy now. Penn State DE Kevin Givens (30) zeros in on Maryland QB in 2018 in PSU win. In his fourth year for the 49ers, he’ll need to apply pressure on Patrick Mahomes this Sunday, a much tougher chore.
All photos by Steve Koreivo, ed. Member of Football Writers Association of America (FWAA).
Lebanon, TN – Blake Toppmeyer, USA TODAY Network’s SEC Columnist, delivered an informative column regarding the current angst between the NCAA and the University of Tennessee regarding alleged violations of NIL Policy. His January 31 article, “I have no sympathy for NCAA, but not much for Tennessee Vols, either. Both asked for this.” We agree. And this is most likely a testing ground for the NCAA before it starts to consider violations among other members.
There’s an irritating aspect of this entire, pre-fabricated witch hunt and why it’s a waste of time. The NCAA consists of all the members of the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS). They not only abide by the current terms, but they formulated and approved the Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) policy. In the meantime, the membership also started lobbying their local state governments. They wanted to protect their fiefdoms from any possible NCAA violations. States arbitrarily passed new laws to eventually do so.
NIL? Collectives? News to me
In doing research for my book released last October, Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly, the ugliness of college football truly exposed itself to me. My curiosity piqued when I conversed with some fans of a major powerhouse on a shuttle bus back to the parking lot after a game. In nonchalant conversation, they said how the school administration invited season ticket holders/boosters to on-campus presentations. The admin proposed that they each donate $25,000 to the NIL fund being run by their “collective.” If they met a designated financial goal, two Fortune 500 companies would each donate one million dollars to the collective’s NIL fund.
Right to my sources
I approached several collectives and athletic departments of institutions of higher learning directly about explaining how this NIL policy could not violate “pay for play” violations. They basically crawled into their shells. All are FBS members or affiliated with them. One private school collective rep was very open about the policies. With minimal direct state government ties, the former player discussed the policy as openly as I could respect. I sent him my final notes, and he was fine about what I had written. We discussed basically how their collective would operate. After results of further analysis, I determined to keep him and his school anonymous in Fifty Years along with the others I approached.
Narrower collective focus
My second discussion with a collective from a Group of Five school went differently. I could tell my questioning didn’t go well with him. Like the first contact, I sent him my proposed verbiage to use in the book. After his review, he insisted not to use his name. As a former player, he felt I was anti-player. He surmised I was totally against players not making any income off their Names, Images and Likenesses. It was a tough line of questioning I admit. I derived that skill from my career as a Purchasing Manager. However, I was seeing the perspective better from the players’ side.
On the other hand, my further research indicated an excess of what he talked about and what I thought it would be. I agreed to abide by with his wish. However, in my parting email, I asked if he felt Power Five teams with more money in their NILs would poach his school’s players. I never got a response to that.
Who’s keeping an eye on NIL compliance?
I realized my most pressing question still needed to be answered. I targeted to interview an NIL compliance officer at some school, any school. Another program with which I have some pretty good ties to just avoided me after I spoke to my primary contact. At another, a terse and telling message came from the compliance officer. Through my contact there, I was told the manager refused to talk to me. I was told that their job regarding compliance meant being sure that the collectives were “in compliance with their state laws.” That said everything to me. The NIL policy released by the NCAA triggered all the state schools to start enlisting their lobbyists to protect them from any future infractions. Through third parties known as collectives, states started buffering legal protection against NCAA violations. Recruiting was about to become a free-for-all.
Built-in Loopholes
As researched online and reported in my book, the “Do’s and Don’ts of NILs” stipulate rules to be followed by schools, members of the NCAA, and potential student athletes. I assumed high school recruits only. Who is not specifically mentioned among these creative rules and regulations are specifically “collectives.” Such third parties strategically formed outside the jurisdictions of the schools themselves. Evidently, the limitation for them to offer such opportunities to potential student-athletes left the door wide open for the new transfer portal policy. If that was intentionally done or just an oversight, it doesn’t matter anymore. It’s happening, and no one is stopping it. Last summer, some coaches made statements that their current players were approached. Nobody, however, named the accused.
As addressed in one of my book’s closing essays, “Vision of the Future,” I venture why the NCAA membership wants to do this. In my final essay, “For the Love of the Game,” I offer some solutions. My objective is to find happy mediums among schools, players and fans. If there is no turning back these policies with such little thought regarding implications or necessary controls (here, I interject,” supposedly”) to build more fairness rather than less for 134 FBS members, we could lose our great, national pastime.
NIL – only the beginning of losing legal battles for the NCAA
As Toppmeyer summarizes at the end of his article, “(University of Tennessee Chancellor Donde) Plowman wrote to (NCAA President Charlie) Baker, the NCAA lacks credibility. The association’s pleas for congressional help in the areas of antitrust and NIL fell on deaf ears, and the courts stand ready to hand a toothless NCAA its next crippling defeat.” The University of Tennessee and 133 other FBS members make up the NCAA. The schools put the NCAA exactly where they wanted them. More steps yet to come for what the major universities want. It falls in line with the entire scheme I propose in Fifty Years of Tailgate Tales: The Good, the Fun and the Ugly. Emphasis on the word “ugly” here, of course.
-Steve Koreivo, ed. Member of the Football Writers Association of America
Tennessee races into Nissan Stadium for the 2021 Music City Bowl. Last season, we saw them open their season here again against Virginia.
Columbus, Ohio – According to Colin Gay’s online article in the Columbus Dispatch on January 21, 2024, “Ohio State adds 2024 5-star quarterback Julian Sayin through transfer portal from Alabama,” Sayin becomes at least the fifth quarterback on the Buckeye roster. What the article fails to address, however, are guesses as to which among them will still be around after the next opening of the transfer portal following spring practice sessions. Check out the credentials among these potential Buckeye QBs:
Sayin arrives as a former five-star QB who signed with Bama and left after Nick Saban’s retirement. Four-star Washington QB Austin Mack followed coach Kalen DeBoer to roll The Tide.
Former Kansas State starting quarterback Will Howard already transferred to Columbus after the 2023 season. He only has one year of eligibility remaining.
Redshirt sophomore Devin Brown has been waiting in the wings after Kyle McCord transferred and an injury removed him at the start of the Goodyear Cotton Bowl at the end of 2023.
Redshirt freshman Lincoln Kienholz played quarterback in the Cotton Bowl to replace Brown in the loss to Missouri.
Freshman Air Noland landed at Ohio State ranked as the No. 4 high school quarterback in the 2024 class per 247Sports’ composite rankings.
QB coach moving in; quarterback moving out.
Surely to attain such talent, on January 19, OSU Head Coach Ryan Day announced the hiring of former Alabama offensive coordinator and the former New England quarterback mentor of Tom Brady, Bill O’Brien. However, there’s a fine line when it comes to starting at quarterback at Ohio State. Last year’s starter, Kyle McCord threw for 3,776 yards, 24 touchdowns, and eight interceptions. The 30-24 loss to Michigan in the traditional, annual rivalry probably sealed McCord’s career in Columbus as they fell from College Football Playoff contention. On a potential scoring drive, McCord threw an interception with seconds left. With one year of eligibility remaining, he took the portal to Syracuse. Good luck to him.
All for one? One for all?
Lots of quarterback talent at Ohio State, but do any have the patience to sit the bench in 2024 if not beyond? With more NIL money than the national defense budget being thrown around and the transfer portal enticing players, especially quarterbacks, from among top Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) programs, does Ohio State figure all this talent will stick around? Who would wait for an injury or a transfer by the quarterback who stands atop the depth chart at the end of spring camp? No one! Commitment, loyalty and teamwork were written off by all members of the NCAA membership. There’s no more of giving “the old college try.” Ha! No such thing anymore. The new message is if you can’t start, feel free to play for someone else. And if things don’t work out the first time, go play somewhere else.
If your coach leaves, quit and follow him, if he’ll have you. Leave all the teammates behind who relied on you. Of course, they’re also planning on leaving to join this new wide-open world of free agency. Not that there’s any guarantee that another FBS program is interested. And does anybody care, even the NCAA, if the players get college educations anymore? Why should they? With all this NIL money, they’re probably all set for life doing television commercials, right? Hopefully, they make the big bucks quickly because there will certainly be some other fresh, pretty images entering the market right behind them. Without that old “sheepskin,” it’s unsure what the name, image or likeness will be worth without it.
Spring fling?
Look for the real quarterback bidding war to start after spring football camp breaks in Columbus, Ohio. Five QBs will eyeball the final depth chart. Figure three of them probably seek playing time elsewhere.
Steve Koreivo, ed. – Member of Football Writers Association of America
In 2016 during a much simpler time, junior JT Barrett played quarterback for Ohio State when others like freshman Dwayne Haskins and redshirt freshman Joe Burrow both rode the bench. With NILs and the current transfer portal, that won’t be happening any longer.
